Portuguese vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,924,243 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $82,287, a difference of 28.0%), median household income ($88,976 compared to $69,947, a difference of 27.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $78,168, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $53,060, a difference of 15.8%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $47,729, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 42.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 39.2%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.72%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.84%), family households (65.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.3%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.26%), 10th grade (93.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 45.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.9%).