Taiwanese vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,016,409 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.273% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 272.9 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $78,168, a difference of 29.8%), per capita income ($46,455 compared to $35,999, a difference of 29.0%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $69,947, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $45,450, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $47,729, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 62.1%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 55.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 61.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 53.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.50%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.2%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.14%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and 11th grade (91.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 71.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 66.7%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.4%).