Alsatian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,912,029 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to a decrease of 43.0 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $35,999, a difference of 31.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $82,287, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $78,168, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $45,450, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $47,729, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.32%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.5%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (44.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 66.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.3%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 53.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.8%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 46.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.4%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.3%).