Immigrants from Asia vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,741,601 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.644. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $69,947, a difference of 42.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $78,168, a difference of 41.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $82,287, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $45,450, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $53,060, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 63.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 55.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 37.7%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.7%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 70.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 67.8%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 76.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 73.1%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.8%).