Indian (Asian) vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,163,956 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $78,168, a difference of 52.9%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $69,947, a difference of 50.5%), and per capita income ($53,874 compared to $35,999, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $45,450, a difference of 28.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $53,060, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 74.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 61.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 55.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 46.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 42.4%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.89%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 78.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 102.0%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 101.2%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 86.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 85.4%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.3%).