Immigrants from Scotland vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,379,604 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.556% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 556.4 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $35,999, a difference of 38.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $82,287, a difference of 36.3%), and median family income ($114,392 compared to $84,835, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $45,450, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $33,775, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 58.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 54.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.7%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.54%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.7%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 57.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 52.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.1%).