Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Architecture & Engineering
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in Alabama

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in Alabama

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Whatley 30.3% 2.4% (+27.9)#1 2.1% (+28.2)#58
2. Beaverton 25.0% 2.4% (+22.6)#2 2.1% (+22.9)#86
3. Emerald Mountain 16.4% 2.4% (+14.0)#3 2.1% (+14.3)#190
4. Putnam 14.7% 2.4% (+12.3)#4 2.1% (+12.6)#238
5. Geraldine 14.6% 2.4% (+12.1)#5 2.1% (+12.4)#244
6. Webb 13.8% 2.4% (+11.4)#6 2.1% (+11.7)#273
7. New Hope 13.8% 2.4% (+11.4)#7 2.1% (+11.7)#275
8. Madison 11.9% 2.4% (+9.50)#8 2.1% (+9.76)#359
9. Lowndesboro 11.8% 2.4% (+9.36)#9 2.1% (+9.62)#371
10. Gilbertown 11.3% 2.4% (+8.86)#10 2.1% (+9.12)#402
11. Belle Fontaine 10.4% 2.4% (+8.01)#11 2.1% (+8.27)#457
12. Union Springs 10.0% 2.4% (+7.56)#12 2.1% (+7.82)#501
13. Lookout Mountain 9.6% 2.4% (+7.22)#13 2.1% (+7.48)#523
14. Huntsville 7.8% 2.4% (+5.39)#14 2.1% (+5.65)#753
15. Anderson 7.6% 2.4% (+5.20)#15 2.1% (+5.46)#791
16. Triana 7.2% 2.4% (+4.78)#16 2.1% (+5.04)#883
17. Rutledge 6.9% 2.4% (+4.52)#17 2.1% (+4.78)#950
18. Hazel Green 6.8% 2.4% (+4.43)#18 2.1% (+4.69)#973
19. Luverne 6.8% 2.4% (+4.37)#19 2.1% (+4.63)#984
20. Priceville 6.5% 2.4% (+4.05)#20 2.1% (+4.31)#1,059
21. Holly Pond 6.4% 2.4% (+3.98)#21 2.1% (+4.24)#1,088
22. Berlin 6.3% 2.4% (+3.89)#22 2.1% (+4.15)#1,115
23. Pine Apple 6.2% 2.4% (+3.84)#23 2.1% (+4.10)#1,141
24. Eclectic 6.2% 2.4% (+3.80)#24 2.1% (+4.06)#1,156
25. Munford 6.1% 2.4% (+3.71)#25 2.1% (+3.97)#1,191
26. East Point 6.1% 2.4% (+3.65)#26 2.1% (+3.91)#1,206
27. Ider 6.0% 2.4% (+3.62)#27 2.1% (+3.87)#1,227
28. Hackneyville 5.8% 2.4% (+3.44)#28 2.1% (+3.69)#1,319
29. Redstone Arsenal 5.8% 2.4% (+3.43)#29 2.1% (+3.69)#1,322
30. Weogufka 5.8% 2.4% (+3.40)#30 2.1% (+3.66)#1,338
31. Mooresville 5.7% 2.4% (+3.31)#31 2.1% (+3.57)#1,384
32. Cottondale 5.6% 2.4% (+3.24)#32 2.1% (+3.50)#1,417
33. Elkmont 5.4% 2.4% (+3.01)#33 2.1% (+3.27)#1,549
34. Brent 5.4% 2.4% (+3.01)#34 2.1% (+3.27)#1,551
35. Harvest 5.3% 2.4% (+2.92)#35 2.1% (+3.17)#1,613
36. Brook Highland 5.3% 2.4% (+2.88)#36 2.1% (+3.14)#1,630
37. Tarrant 5.3% 2.4% (+2.86)#37 2.1% (+3.12)#1,643
38. Red Bay 5.2% 2.4% (+2.78)#38 2.1% (+3.04)#1,702
39. Moody 5.1% 2.4% (+2.65)#39 2.1% (+2.91)#1,792
40. North Courtland 4.9% 2.4% (+2.48)#40 2.1% (+2.74)#1,906
41. Dauphin Island 4.9% 2.4% (+2.47)#41 2.1% (+2.73)#1,910
42. Newville 4.8% 2.4% (+2.39)#42 2.1% (+2.65)#1,983
43. South Vinemont 4.6% 2.4% (+2.18)#43 2.1% (+2.44)#2,154
44. Glencoe 4.5% 2.4% (+2.14)#44 2.1% (+2.40)#2,185
45. Pickensville 4.4% 2.4% (+2.00)#45 2.1% (+2.26)#2,303
46. Eva 4.4% 2.4% (+1.95)#46 2.1% (+2.21)#2,354
47. Union Grove 4.3% 2.4% (+1.94)#47 2.1% (+2.20)#2,370
48. Spanish Fort 4.3% 2.4% (+1.91)#48 2.1% (+2.17)#2,388
49. Langston 4.3% 2.4% (+1.89)#49 2.1% (+2.15)#2,402
50. Helena 4.3% 2.4% (+1.87)#50 2.1% (+2.12)#2,426
51. Remlap 4.2% 2.4% (+1.80)#51 2.1% (+2.06)#2,513
52. Semmes 4.2% 2.4% (+1.77)#52 2.1% (+2.03)#2,554
53. Mccalla 4.0% 2.4% (+1.62)#53 2.1% (+1.88)#2,746
54. Avon 4.0% 2.4% (+1.57)#54 2.1% (+1.83)#2,801
55. Athens 3.9% 2.4% (+1.52)#55 2.1% (+1.78)#2,860
56. Pine Level 3.9% 2.4% (+1.48)#56 2.1% (+1.73)#2,919
57. Guntersville 3.9% 2.4% (+1.46)#57 2.1% (+1.71)#2,943
58. Meridianville 3.8% 2.4% (+1.44)#58 2.1% (+1.69)#2,964
59. Ardmore 3.8% 2.4% (+1.43)#59 2.1% (+1.68)#2,975
60. Thorsby 3.8% 2.4% (+1.42)#60 2.1% (+1.67)#2,990
61. Ashland 3.8% 2.4% (+1.38)#61 2.1% (+1.64)#3,033
62. Perdido 3.8% 2.4% (+1.36)#62 2.1% (+1.62)#3,067
63. Weaver 3.7% 2.4% (+1.30)#63 2.1% (+1.56)#3,151
64. Hytop 3.7% 2.4% (+1.30)#64 2.1% (+1.55)#3,157
65. Lakeview 3.7% 2.4% (+1.30)#65 2.1% (+1.55)#3,163
66. Daphne 3.7% 2.4% (+1.29)#66 2.1% (+1.55)#3,175
67. Auburn 3.7% 2.4% (+1.27)#67 2.1% (+1.53)#3,206
68. Boaz 3.6% 2.4% (+1.20)#68 2.1% (+1.46)#3,335
69. Northport 3.6% 2.4% (+1.20)#69 2.1% (+1.45)#3,340
70. Arab 3.6% 2.4% (+1.19)#70 2.1% (+1.45)#3,343
71. Troy 3.5% 2.4% (+1.13)#71 2.1% (+1.38)#3,472
72. Grove Hill 3.5% 2.4% (+1.10)#72 2.1% (+1.36)#3,510
73. Trinity 3.5% 2.4% (+1.10)#73 2.1% (+1.36)#3,518
74. West End Cobb Town 3.5% 2.4% (+1.10)#74 2.1% (+1.36)#3,526
75. Crossville 3.4% 2.4% (+1.03)#75 2.1% (+1.29)#3,644
76. Libertyville 3.4% 2.4% (+0.983)#76 2.1% (+1.24)#3,739
77. Berry 3.4% 2.4% (+0.973)#77 2.1% (+1.23)#3,755
78. Coker 3.4% 2.4% (+0.964)#78 2.1% (+1.22)#3,776
79. Lester 3.3% 2.4% (+0.926)#79 2.1% (+1.18)#3,851
80. Pelham 3.3% 2.4% (+0.926)#80 2.1% (+1.18)#3,857
81. Woodville 3.3% 2.4% (+0.918)#81 2.1% (+1.18)#3,870
82. Hoover 3.3% 2.4% (+0.913)#82 2.1% (+1.17)#3,874
83. Millbrook 3.2% 2.4% (+0.809)#83 2.1% (+1.07)#4,070
84. Daviston 3.2% 2.4% (+0.784)#84 2.1% (+1.04)#4,120
85. Satsuma 3.2% 2.4% (+0.757)#85 2.1% (+1.01)#4,192
86. Eagle Point 3.1% 2.4% (+0.728)#86 2.1% (+0.985)#4,250
87. Owens Cross Roads 3.1% 2.4% (+0.664)#87 2.1% (+0.921)#4,396
88. Gainesville 3.0% 2.4% (+0.623)#88 2.1% (+0.881)#4,501
89. Toxey 3.0% 2.4% (+0.623)#89 2.1% (+0.881)#4,508
90. Shelby 2.9% 2.4% (+0.502)#90 2.1% (+0.760)#4,816
91. Dora 2.9% 2.4% (+0.481)#91 2.1% (+0.738)#4,882
92. Excel 2.9% 2.4% (+0.467)#92 2.1% (+0.724)#4,917
93. Vance 2.8% 2.4% (+0.430)#93 2.1% (+0.688)#5,015
94. Indian Springs Village 2.8% 2.4% (+0.419)#94 2.1% (+0.677)#5,038
95. Meadowbrook 2.8% 2.4% (+0.416)#95 2.1% (+0.674)#5,047
96. Rainsville 2.8% 2.4% (+0.398)#96 2.1% (+0.656)#5,106
97. Elberta 2.7% 2.4% (+0.313)#97 2.1% (+0.571)#5,363
98. Snead 2.7% 2.4% (+0.291)#98 2.1% (+0.549)#5,438
99. Talladega Springs 2.7% 2.4% (+0.260)#99 2.1% (+0.517)#5,532
100. Anniston 2.7% 2.4% (+0.247)#100 2.1% (+0.505)#5,569

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in Alabama are:
#1
30.3%
#2
25.0%
#3
16.4%
#4
14.7%
#5
14.6%
#6
13.8%
#7
13.8%
#8
11.9%
#9
11.8%
#10
11.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in Alabama?
Whatley has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in Alabama with 30.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in Alabama is 2.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States is 2.1%.