Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Father
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Alabama

80.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Alabama Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Alabama

City Single Father Poverty vs State vs National
1. Phenix City 2.8% 17.8% (-15.0)#1 13.7% (-10.9)#159
2. Pelham 3.1% 17.8% (-14.7)#2 13.7% (-10.6)#201
3. Cowarts 3.6% 17.8% (-14.2)#3 13.7% (-10.1)#258
4. Tillmans Corner 4.9% 17.8% (-12.9)#4 13.7% (-8.83)#426
5. Millbrook 5.8% 17.8% (-12.0)#5 13.7% (-7.92)#547
6. Alabaster 5.8% 17.8% (-12.0)#6 13.7% (-7.87)#554
7. Spanish Fort 6.6% 17.8% (-11.2)#7 13.7% (-7.11)#656
8. Gardendale 7.0% 17.8% (-10.8)#8 13.7% (-6.71)#718
9. Boaz 7.7% 17.8% (-10.1)#9 13.7% (-5.97)#857
10. Decatur 8.2% 17.8% (-9.55)#10 13.7% (-5.46)#939
11. Hoover 8.7% 17.8% (-9.12)#11 13.7% (-5.04)#1,014
12. Jasper 8.8% 17.8% (-8.97)#12 13.7% (-4.89)#1,037
13. Alexander City 9.8% 17.8% (-8.04)#13 13.7% (-3.96)#1,180
14. Huntsville 10.4% 17.8% (-7.43)#14 13.7% (-3.34)#1,281
15. Guntersville 10.5% 17.8% (-7.27)#15 13.7% (-3.19)#1,298
16. Crossville 11.1% 17.8% (-6.68)#16 13.7% (-2.60)#1,411
17. Russellville 11.5% 17.8% (-6.33)#17 13.7% (-2.25)#1,457
18. Auburn 12.0% 17.8% (-5.82)#18 13.7% (-1.74)#1,528
19. Madison 12.0% 17.8% (-5.77)#19 13.7% (-1.69)#1,542
20. Sylvan Springs 12.5% 17.8% (-5.30)#20 13.7% (-1.21)#1,623
21. Cullman 12.6% 17.8% (-5.16)#21 13.7% (-1.08)#1,654
22. Irondale 13.0% 17.8% (-4.75)#22 13.7% (-0.669)#1,706
23. Helena 13.1% 17.8% (-4.70)#23 13.7% (-0.617)#1,714
24. Sardis City 15.8% 17.8% (-2.01)#24 13.7% (+2.08)#2,127
25. Town Creek 15.8% 17.8% (-2.01)#25 13.7% (+2.08)#2,130
26. Muscle Shoals 16.1% 17.8% (-1.65)#26 13.7% (+2.44)#2,173
27. Eufaula 16.7% 17.8% (-1.13)#27 13.7% (+2.95)#2,231
28. Wilsonville 16.7% 17.8% (-1.13)#28 13.7% (+2.95)#2,249
29. Ardmore 16.7% 17.8% (-1.13)#29 13.7% (+2.95)#2,260
30. Addison 16.7% 17.8% (-1.13)#30 13.7% (+2.95)#2,274
31. Dothan 16.7% 17.8% (-1.06)#31 13.7% (+3.03)#2,297
32. Bay Minette 16.9% 17.8% (-0.894)#32 13.7% (+3.19)#2,313
33. Homewood 17.0% 17.8% (-0.815)#33 13.7% (+3.27)#2,322
34. Gulf Shores 17.0% 17.8% (-0.774)#34 13.7% (+3.31)#2,325
35. Riverside 17.1% 17.8% (-0.653)#35 13.7% (+3.43)#2,337
36. Arab 18.3% 17.8% (+0.474)#36 13.7% (+4.56)#2,489
37. Ashford 19.1% 17.8% (+1.35)#37 13.7% (+5.44)#2,601
38. Lincoln 19.2% 17.8% (+1.44)#38 13.7% (+5.52)#2,607
39. Jacksonville 19.4% 17.8% (+1.62)#39 13.7% (+5.71)#2,629
40. Attalla 19.5% 17.8% (+1.74)#40 13.7% (+5.82)#2,649
41. Rehobeth 20.4% 17.8% (+2.61)#41 13.7% (+6.70)#2,793
42. Gadsden 20.6% 17.8% (+2.84)#42 13.7% (+6.92)#2,814
43. Sheffield 20.8% 17.8% (+3.04)#43 13.7% (+7.12)#2,840
44. Coosada 20.8% 17.8% (+3.04)#44 13.7% (+7.12)#2,846
45. Pinckard 21.4% 17.8% (+3.63)#45 13.7% (+7.72)#2,915
46. Tuskegee 22.2% 17.8% (+4.43)#46 13.7% (+8.51)#2,999
47. Saraland 22.8% 17.8% (+4.96)#47 13.7% (+9.05)#3,072
48. Sylacauga 23.4% 17.8% (+5.62)#48 13.7% (+9.71)#3,145
49. Florence 23.7% 17.8% (+5.90)#49 13.7% (+9.98)#3,175
50. Ozark 23.9% 17.8% (+6.15)#50 13.7% (+10.2)#3,189
51. Opp 25.0% 17.8% (+7.20)#51 13.7% (+11.3)#3,265
52. Sylvania 25.0% 17.8% (+7.20)#52 13.7% (+11.3)#3,281
53. Wadley 25.0% 17.8% (+7.20)#53 13.7% (+11.3)#3,294
54. Selma 27.1% 17.8% (+9.27)#54 13.7% (+13.4)#3,495
55. Brundidge 27.3% 17.8% (+9.48)#55 13.7% (+13.6)#3,507
56. Enterprise 27.6% 17.8% (+9.84)#56 13.7% (+13.9)#3,549
57. Mobile 27.8% 17.8% (+9.98)#57 13.7% (+14.1)#3,554
58. Excel 28.6% 17.8% (+10.8)#58 13.7% (+14.9)#3,642
59. Prattville 28.9% 17.8% (+11.1)#59 13.7% (+15.2)#3,663
60. Andalusia 29.4% 17.8% (+11.6)#60 13.7% (+15.7)#3,701
61. Fort Payne 29.6% 17.8% (+11.8)#61 13.7% (+15.9)#3,714
62. Thomasville 29.9% 17.8% (+12.1)#62 13.7% (+16.2)#3,740
63. Mountain Brook 31.6% 17.8% (+13.8)#63 13.7% (+17.9)#3,894
64. Montgomery 32.6% 17.8% (+14.8)#64 13.7% (+18.9)#3,970
65. Collinsville 33.3% 17.8% (+15.5)#65 13.7% (+19.6)#4,013
66. Woodville 33.3% 17.8% (+15.5)#66 13.7% (+19.6)#4,036
67. Lisman 33.3% 17.8% (+15.5)#67 13.7% (+19.6)#4,085
68. Valley 33.8% 17.8% (+16.0)#68 13.7% (+20.1)#4,143
69. Birmingham 34.1% 17.8% (+16.4)#69 13.7% (+20.4)#4,160
70. Bessemer 34.3% 17.8% (+16.5)#70 13.7% (+20.5)#4,170
71. Fairfield 35.2% 17.8% (+17.4)#71 13.7% (+21.5)#4,240
72. Anniston 35.5% 17.8% (+17.7)#72 13.7% (+21.7)#4,260
73. Oxford 36.3% 17.8% (+18.5)#73 13.7% (+22.5)#4,315
74. Bayou La Batre 36.7% 17.8% (+18.9)#74 13.7% (+23.0)#4,347
75. Hackleburg 37.5% 17.8% (+19.7)#75 13.7% (+23.8)#4,405
76. Brantley 37.5% 17.8% (+19.7)#76 13.7% (+23.8)#4,411
77. Munford 38.0% 17.8% (+20.2)#77 13.7% (+24.3)#4,443
78. Minor 38.2% 17.8% (+20.4)#78 13.7% (+24.5)#4,457
79. Foley 39.5% 17.8% (+21.7)#79 13.7% (+25.8)#4,527
80. Waterloo 40.0% 17.8% (+22.2)#80 13.7% (+26.3)#4,610
81. Tarrant 40.7% 17.8% (+22.9)#81 13.7% (+27.0)#4,633
82. Ariton 41.2% 17.8% (+23.4)#82 13.7% (+27.5)#4,653
83. Talladega 42.3% 17.8% (+24.5)#83 13.7% (+28.6)#4,714
84. Blountsville 42.9% 17.8% (+25.1)#84 13.7% (+29.1)#4,748
85. Columbia 43.5% 17.8% (+25.7)#85 13.7% (+29.8)#4,792
86. Cedar Bluff 44.0% 17.8% (+26.2)#86 13.7% (+30.3)#4,820
87. Greenville 46.3% 17.8% (+28.5)#87 13.7% (+32.6)#4,926
88. Wedowee 46.7% 17.8% (+28.9)#88 13.7% (+33.0)#4,941
89. Dadeville 47.3% 17.8% (+29.5)#89 13.7% (+33.6)#4,966
90. Daphne 48.9% 17.8% (+31.1)#90 13.7% (+35.2)#5,020
91. Midfield 50.0% 17.8% (+32.2)#91 13.7% (+36.3)#5,060
92. Trafford 50.0% 17.8% (+32.2)#92 13.7% (+36.3)#5,153
93. Center Point 50.3% 17.8% (+32.5)#93 13.7% (+36.6)#5,229
94. Thorsby 52.1% 17.8% (+34.3)#94 13.7% (+38.4)#5,284
95. Adamsville 54.7% 17.8% (+36.9)#95 13.7% (+41.0)#5,404
96. Elba 56.5% 17.8% (+38.7)#96 13.7% (+42.8)#5,465
97. Maplesville 57.1% 17.8% (+39.3)#97 13.7% (+43.4)#5,500
98. Falkville 58.3% 17.8% (+40.5)#98 13.7% (+44.6)#5,544
99. Berry 60.0% 17.8% (+42.2)#99 13.7% (+46.3)#5,606
100. Moulton 61.7% 17.8% (+43.9)#100 13.7% (+48.0)#5,687

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Alabama are:
#1
2.8%
#2
3.1%
#3
3.6%
#4
4.9%
#5
5.8%
#6
5.8%
#7
6.6%
#8
7.0%
#9
7.7%
#10
8.2%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Alabama?
Phenix City has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Alabama with 2.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the State of Alabama?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Alabama is 17.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States is 13.7%.