Immigrants from Taiwan vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,779,069 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to an increase of 22.6 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and South African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $103,160, a difference of 25.2%), median household income ($116,460 compared to $93,379, a difference of 24.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($135,508 compared to $109,719, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.1%), per capita income ($57,742 compared to $50,044, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $51,383, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and South African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 38.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and South African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 32.6%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.6%), and divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and currently married (50.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and South African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.7%), master's degree (22.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and professional degree (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.9%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.0%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.6%).