Chinese vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,813,215 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 11.3 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and South African communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $65,652, a difference of 18.0%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,383, a difference of 13.2%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $50,044, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,825, a difference of 0.88%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $103,160, a difference of 1.1%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $113,229, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and South African communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and South African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.86%), currently married (49.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and South African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.6%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and South African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and South African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.7%).