Chickasaw vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,817,669 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,044, a difference of 37.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $109,719, a difference of 33.5%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $93,379, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,383, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,825, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.3%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.20%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.61%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 69.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 58.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.1%).