Scottish vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,004,003 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 127.8 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,440 compared to $50,044, a difference of 12.6%), median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $61,460, a difference of 10.2%), and median household income ($85,101 compared to $93,379, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $51,383, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $65,652, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and South African communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.010%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 34.2%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and South African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.4%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 51.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.1%), no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.0%).