Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,267,268 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 0.5 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $50,044, a difference of 25.7%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $61,460, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,383, a difference of 5.4%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $41,825, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $65,652, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and South African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.9%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.2%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and South African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and South African communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.36%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and South African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 78.9%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.3%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%).