Immigrants from China vs South African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
South African
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
South Africans
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs South African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,538,293 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,556,547 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 16.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | South African |
| Minimum | 0.84% | 0.42% |
| Maximum | 12.9% | 5.4% |
| Range | 12.1% | 5.0% |
| Mean | 1.9% | 2.1% |
| Median | 1.6% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.9% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.43% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.0% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (1.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Korea (1.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Bolivia (1.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Israel (1.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Pakistani (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Iraqi (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 74.6 /100 | #152 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 2.1% |
| Slovenes | 73.6 /100 | #154 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 2.1% |
| Pakistanis | 71.6 /100 | #156 | Good 2.1% |
| Serbians | 70.2 /100 | #157 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 69.9 /100 | #158 | Good 2.1% |
| South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #159 | Good 2.1% |
| Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
| Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
| Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
| Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |