Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,462,690 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.145% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 145.2 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 62.6%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $63,041, a difference of 24.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $106,164, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $40,977, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $51,370, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $48,673, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 66.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 54.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.2%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 55.9%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 45.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.8%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (62.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 333.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 137.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 119.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 99.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 119.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.4%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.4%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.020%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.7%).