Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,880,579 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 60.8 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $45,066, a difference of 8.1%), median family income ($101,061 compared to $107,715, a difference of 6.6%), and median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $57,145, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $63,041, a difference of 0.23%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($86,255 compared to $89,412, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.37%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.5%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.60%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.79%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.2%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and male disability (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.1%).