Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,384,742 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 38.6 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $51,370, a difference of 8.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $97,185, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $63,041, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $106,164, a difference of 0.15%), median family income ($108,570 compared to $107,715, a difference of 0.79%), and median household income ($90,549 compared to $89,412, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.6%), male poverty (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.72%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.9%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.6%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.38%).