Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,588,357 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 34.4 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $45,066, a difference of 27.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $97,185, a difference of 20.6%), and median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $57,145, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $51,370, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $63,041, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.31%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.80%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.92%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 80.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 65.6%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 8th grade (96.0% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%).