Pima vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,923,705 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 10.8 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,066, a difference of 47.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $106,164, a difference of 44.7%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $89,412, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,370, a difference of 0.26%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,977, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $97,185, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 123.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 115.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 104.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 42.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 48.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 166.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 109.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 77.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 63.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 74.4%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 73.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 72.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.0%).