Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Jordan
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Jordan
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,254,097 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,116,498 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.20% |
Maximum | 7.7% | 11.7% |
Range | 6.0% | 11.5% |
Mean | 5.1% | 5.2% |
Median | 5.1% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Jordan by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Italy (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Greece (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |