Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,497,629 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.548. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to an increase of 16.9 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($65,329 compared to $51,370, a difference of 27.2%), wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,936 compared to $97,185, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,195 compared to $45,066, a difference of 0.29%), median earnings ($48,304 compared to $48,673, a difference of 0.76%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,108 compared to $63,041, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (13.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 39.3%), single father poverty (11.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and single male poverty (9.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 31.8%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (68.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.1%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.050%), college, 1 year or more (61.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.9%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.2%).