Crow vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,727,568 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.317. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.234% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 233.7 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $37,254, a difference of 17.4%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $71,860, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $80,326, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $48,535, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $36,414, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $41,119, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 75.0%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 74.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 215.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 214.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 192.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.6%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.33, a difference of 15.0%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 77.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 75.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 11.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 54.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 77.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (99.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 2.6%), kindergarten (99.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 1st grade (99.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%).