Immigrants from Singapore vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,819,067 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Immigrant from Singapore communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Singapore within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.209% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Singapore corresponds to a decrease of 208.9 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($134,818 compared to $83,319, a difference of 61.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,514 compared to $82,513, a difference of 57.0%), and per capita income ($58,353 compared to $37,254, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,835 compared to $50,757, a difference of 12.0%), median female earnings ($47,986 compared to $36,414, a difference of 31.8%), and wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 41.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 136.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 79.4%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.0%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and single mother poverty (25.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 68.9%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 55.4%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.33, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 51.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 187.4%), professional degree (7.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 118.5%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 94.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.3%), ambulatory disability (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.8%), and self-care disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.21%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.2%).