Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,757,760 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.090% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to a decrease of 89.9 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $48,535, a difference of 30.2%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $82,513, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $50,757, a difference of 5.2%), median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $36,414, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($45,933 compared to $41,119, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 68.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 57.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.57%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.4%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.33, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (66.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 145.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 81.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 36.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 59.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and college, under 1 year (65.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%).