Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,645,254 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.388% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 388.4 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $50,757, a difference of 17.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $80,326, a difference of 11.3%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $71,860, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($82,216 compared to $83,319, a difference of 1.3%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $37,254, a difference of 4.3%), and median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $46,193, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 46.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 40.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and poverty (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 33.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in family households (59.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 10.3%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.33%), currently married (41.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 95.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 11.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.4%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and college, under 1 year (61.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.8%).