Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,163,622 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.127% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 126.8 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $48,535, a difference of 35.7%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $83,319, a difference of 32.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $82,513, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,757, a difference of 0.99%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $36,414, a difference of 12.0%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $41,119, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 106.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 80.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 32.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 38.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 38.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.33, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 117.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 13.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 77.3%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 68.2%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%).