Immigrants from Moldova vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,084,859 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.697. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 45.5 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $51,224, a difference of 9.7%), median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $38,738, a difference of 9.2%), and per capita income ($47,489 compared to $43,806, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $60,581, a difference of 3.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $101,387, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $95,070, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and single female poverty (18.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.9%), male poverty (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and poverty (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 17.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.30%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.5%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (90.7% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 11th grade (93.7% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.9%).