Hispanic or Latino vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 366,894,671 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.677. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,688 compared to $43,806, a difference of 22.8%), median family income ($85,647 compared to $103,273, a difference of 20.6%), and median male earnings ($46,419 compared to $55,382, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $51,224, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($34,421 compared to $38,738, a difference of 12.5%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 72.1%), receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 53.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.2%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (67.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 87.2%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.41%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.1%).