Alsatian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,655,043 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.386% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 385.9 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.3%), per capita income ($47,284 compared to $43,806, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $51,224, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $55,382, a difference of 0.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $95,070, a difference of 0.010%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $84,965, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 54.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 8.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.40%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (61.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 68.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.8%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.7%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.13%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.0%).