Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tlingit-Haida
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tlingit-Haida

Czechoslovakians

Average
Good
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,313,283 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to an increase of 6.7 Czechoslovakians.
Tlingit-Haida Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 17.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $51,224, a difference of 9.2%), and median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $55,382, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,516 compared to $43,806, a difference of 0.67%), median household income ($83,968 compared to $84,965, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($39,513 compared to $38,738, a difference of 2.0%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricTlingit-HaidaCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,516
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,092
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,968
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,468
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,409
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,513
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,914
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,987
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,417
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,922
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
28.2%

Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricTlingit-HaidaCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Good
10.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%

Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 119.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 43.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTlingit-HaidaCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.73%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTlingit-HaidaCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.5%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.9%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.5%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Good
83.0%

Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.1%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 0.55%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.89%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTlingit-HaidaCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Tragic
61.6%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.2%
Fair
32.0%

Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.2%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTlingit-HaidaCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.1%

Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.0%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 0.0%), college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricTlingit-HaidaCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.8%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 36.4%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricTlingit-HaidaCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.1%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Average
2.5%