Uruguayan vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Uruguayans
Czechoslovakians
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Uruguayan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,439,878 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.756. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 71.0 Czechoslovakians.
Uruguayan vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.1%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $55,382, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $101,387, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,691 compared to $84,965, a difference of 0.32%), median earnings ($46,190 compared to $46,658, a difference of 1.0%), and per capita income ($44,318 compared to $43,806, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Uruguayan | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,318 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,656 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,691 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,190 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,680 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,228 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,465 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,631 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,660 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,090 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.2% | Tragic 28.2% |
Uruguayan vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Poverty Metric | Uruguayan | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Fair 13.6% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.1% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Uruguayan vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Uruguayan | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Uruguayan vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Labor Participation Metric | Uruguayan | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Good 83.0% |
Uruguayan vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.7%), currently married (45.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple households (45.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.26%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Uruguayan | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.1% | Fair 32.0% |
Uruguayan vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 22.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Uruguayan | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.7% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Uruguayan vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
Education Level Metric | Uruguayan | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.8% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.5% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.4% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Uruguayan vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.72%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Uruguayan | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Average 2.5% |