Czech vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,563,761 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 45.1 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.5%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $103,273, a difference of 2.5%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $55,382, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.38%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $38,738, a difference of 0.66%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $60,581, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.62%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 4.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.27%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.7%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 0.86%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.0%).