Fijian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,710,353 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 7.6 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 23.1%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $55,382, a difference of 21.4%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $43,806, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $60,581, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $38,738, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 32.7%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.14%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.13, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 0.72%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.7%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.0%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 0.60%), male disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.6%).