Immigrants from Hungary vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,362,726 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to a decrease of 17.2 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,303 compared to $43,806, a difference of 12.6%), median household income ($92,094 compared to $84,965, a difference of 8.4%), and median male earnings ($59,806 compared to $55,382, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $51,224, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,277 compared to $60,581, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.55%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.7%), births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (63.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.2% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.4%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.5%).