Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Czechoslovakians

Average
Good
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,374,291 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.077% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 76.8 Czechoslovakians.
Tsimshian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 18.1%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $55,382, a difference of 13.4%), and per capita income ($40,344 compared to $43,806, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($101,543 compared to $103,273, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($83,346 compared to $84,965, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $38,738, a difference of 2.1%).
Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricTsimshianCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
28.2%

Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 52.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.3%

Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 154.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 81.3%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Good
83.0%

Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Fair
32.0%

Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.7%).
Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.1%

Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.3%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 28.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.68%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%