Immigrants from Asia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,428,077 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.513. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $84,965, a difference of 17.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $95,070, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $101,387, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $51,224, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $60,581, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 18.0%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.75%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 19.6%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.2%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.4%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.96%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%).