Native/Alaskan vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 346,215,796 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 10.5 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $43,806, a difference of 31.6%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $103,273, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $101,387, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $51,224, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $38,738, a difference of 14.6%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 88.3%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 78.2%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 23.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 59.3%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 55.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 46.1%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.3%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.4%).