Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,266,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Turkey communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.241% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Turkey corresponds to an increase of 241.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,368 compared to $43,806, a difference of 17.3%), median family income ($118,325 compared to $103,273, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($96,964 compared to $84,965, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,503 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,672 compared to $60,581, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.2%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.32%), female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (63.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.6%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.6%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.6%).