Thai vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Thai
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Thais

Czechoslovakians

Exceptional
Good
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Thai Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 337,130,897 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to an increase of 0.0 Czechoslovakians.
Thai Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Thai vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $55,382, a difference of 30.2%), median household income ($110,648 compared to $84,965, a difference of 30.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($121,778 compared to $95,070, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $51,224, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $60,581, a difference of 19.0%).
Thai vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricThaiCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,307
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,281
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$110,648
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,237
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$72,135
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$47,577
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$59,187
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$121,778
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$129,560
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,099
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
28.2%

Thai vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 36.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 33.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.0%).
Thai vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricThaiCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.3%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.5%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
10.3%

Thai vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Thai vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricThaiCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Thai vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Thai vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricThaiCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.2%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.9%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.3%
Good
83.0%

Thai vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 33.3%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.0%), family households (67.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (50.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Thai vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricThaiCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.2%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.2%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.0%
Fair
32.0%

Thai vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.5%).
Thai vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricThaiCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.1%

Thai vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.4%), master's degree (21.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 49.6%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.13%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Thai vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricThaiCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
73.4%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
68.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
57.4%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
50.1%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.7%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Fair
1.8%

Thai vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 39.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.6%).
Thai vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricThaiCzechoslovakian
Disability
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.1%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.5%