Immigrants from Ukraine vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,009,207 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Ukraine communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ukraine within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ukraine corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($43,069 compared to $38,738, a difference of 11.2%), wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and per capita income ($48,134 compared to $43,806, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,163 compared to $60,581, a difference of 0.96%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,079 compared to $101,387, a difference of 5.6%), and median family income ($109,645 compared to $103,273, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.72%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 17.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 89.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.5%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.2%).