Immigrants from Colombia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,586,129 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Colombia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Colombia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Colombia corresponds to a decrease of 4.7 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 16.0%), median family income ($98,067 compared to $103,273, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,658 compared to $60,581, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,913 compared to $38,738, a difference of 0.45%), median household income ($83,902 compared to $84,965, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($42,971 compared to $43,806, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.71%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 25.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.5%), currently married (46.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 1.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (66.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (46.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.20%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.3%).