Ute vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,866,927 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 12.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $101,387, a difference of 20.8%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $43,806, a difference of 19.5%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $103,273, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.5%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $38,738, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 57.0%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 50.7%), and poverty (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.4%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.13, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.45%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.4%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.18%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.7%).