Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,824,738 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.125% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 125.3 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $43,806, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($42,386 compared to $38,738, a difference of 9.4%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $60,581, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $101,387, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.33%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (63.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 73.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.5%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.7%).