Mexican vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 365,259,696 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,559 compared to $43,806, a difference of 26.8%), median family income ($85,618 compared to $103,273, a difference of 20.6%), and median male earnings ($46,147 compared to $55,382, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,897 compared to $60,581, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 65.0%), family poverty (11.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 47.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.3%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and family households with children (31.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.59%), married-couple households (47.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (69.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 103.3%), professional degree (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.0%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.8%).