Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Malaysians

Czechoslovakians

Fair
Good
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Malaysian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,387,764 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Czechoslovakians.
Malaysian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.6%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $43,806, a difference of 11.8%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $55,382, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.76%), median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $38,738, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $60,581, a difference of 4.0%).
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricMalaysianCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,194
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,230
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,064
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,844
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,772
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,298
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,615
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,291
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,517
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,244
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
28.2%

Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricMalaysianCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.4%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.3%

Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.94%).
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMalaysianCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%

Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMalaysianCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Good
83.0%

Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.2%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.82%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMalaysianCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Poor
45.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Fair
32.0%

Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMalaysianCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.1%

Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricMalaysianCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.2%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricMalaysianCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Average
2.5%