Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Malaysian
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Malaysians
Czechoslovakians
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Malaysian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,387,764 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Czechoslovakians.
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.6%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $43,806, a difference of 11.8%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $55,382, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.76%), median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $38,738, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $60,581, a difference of 4.0%).
Income Metric | Malaysian | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,194 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,230 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,064 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,844 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,772 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,298 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,615 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,291 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,517 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,244 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 28.2% |
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Poverty Metric | Malaysian | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Poor 9.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.4% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.94%).
Unemployment Metric | Malaysian | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Labor Participation Metric | Malaysian | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.2% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Good 83.0% |
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.2%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.82%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Malaysian | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.9% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Fair 32.0% |
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Malaysian | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Malaysian | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.2% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.6% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.9% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Malaysian vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Malaysian | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Average 2.5% |