Australian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,821,918 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.731. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 138.1 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $43,806, a difference of 18.9%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $103,273, a difference of 14.7%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $84,965, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,224, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $60,581, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.34%), poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 8.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.8%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.2%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 4.5%).