Asian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,360,482 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.524. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $84,965, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $95,070, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $101,387, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $51,224, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $60,581, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 20.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 19.9%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.3%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and poverty (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 19.6%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.83%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 48.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.6%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.76%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.79%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.9%).