Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,767,349 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 5.7 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $101,387, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $60,581, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,532 compared to $46,658, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $38,738, a difference of 3.0%), and per capita income ($41,709 compared to $43,806, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 72.1%), receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 54.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.8%), single female poverty (22.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.3%), female unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 34.8%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 39.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.8%), married-couple households (43.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 228.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 82.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 24.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 54.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 73.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 94.0%), college, under 1 year (61.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and ged/equivalency (81.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 77.2%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.7%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.1%).