Immigrants from Scotland vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,626,399 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.559% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 558.8 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $43,003, a difference of 16.0%), householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $57,975, a difference of 14.9%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $82,810, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $52,672, a difference of 0.060%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $38,436, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.07, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.8%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.8%).