Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,284,917 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.886. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 203.9 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $57,384, a difference of 15.0%), median earnings ($50,741 compared to $57,034, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $46,902, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $69,857, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $55,913, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.97%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 20.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 86.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 42.9%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%).